[Users] A Serious Miscarriage of Justice...

[Tyler]

I'm innocent until proven guilty, and since you all can't seem to present
any of the evidence, then I should be innocent on all counts. Phantom500
should be banned, yes, but not me. Also (IDK if this has anything to do with
it or not, but whatever...) I don't think Doug V likes me all that well. I
know the CL's should be impartial, but I think they sometimes aren't that
way.

-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces at zonebbs.com [mailto:users-bounces at zonebbs.com] On Behalf
Of Robert Cummings
Sent: Friday, 25 December 2009 18:20
To: users at zonebbs.com
Subject: Re: [Users] A Serious Miscarriage of Justice...

Hi.

Discussion of illegal acts is against the TOS, as stated in section 6.

And while fantom500 sent quite a few of the questionable messages, Tyler did
contribute.  I don't have the messages here now, but a quick lookup in QN
History from 22:00 (last night) onwards will reveal all.  But i'm pretty
sure I saw Tyler contributing to this as well.

> ----- Original Message -----
>From: Rachel D Keyte <racheldk at tpg.com.au
>To: users at zonebbs.com
>Date sent: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 10:53:33 +1100
>Subject: Re: [Users] A Serious Miscarriage of Justice...

>OK, but that's the thing right there.  why would you write that
on the
>zone? obviously no-one would have a clue what you're doing and
hence
>may become suss.
>Anyway agree with the others; i wasn't there, but if you were
talking
>about hacking other accounts, that may be considered against the
TOS.
>If you were innocent and were simply just talking to your friends about 
>how such a thing would be done, just for the extra
knowlege,
>you'd be best off doing it away from the zone in future.
>In saying all that though, if there was no proof that you did
hack
>into someone's account, you shouldn't have been banned.  I would
think
>it would be up to the community leaders/admins to be smart enough
to
>distingwish between a physical hack and/or just talking about it; 
>afterall, heaps of the same nonsense goes on the boards.
>Cheers!
>At 10:42 AM 26/12/2009, you wrote:
>>That was the point--it was just a little app I wrote, pretty much
for no
>>reason at all.

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: users-bounces at zonebbs.com
[mailto:users-bounces at zonebbs.com] On Behalf
>>Of Rachel D Keyte
>>Sent: Friday, 25 December 2009 17:39
>>To: users at zonebbs.com
>>Subject: Re: [Users] A Serious Miscarriage of Justice...

>>But I'm not following this.  Why would you want to allocate more
memory, and
>>to what exactly?
>>At 10:16 AM 26/12/2009, you wrote:
>>>OK, so here goes.  Anything preceded by a double slash (//) is a
comment.

>>_______________________________________________
>>Users mailing list
>>Users at zonebbs.com
>>http://www.zonebbs.com/mailman/listinfo/users

>>_______________________________________________
>>Users mailing list
>>Users at zonebbs.com
>>http://www.zonebbs.com/mailman/listinfo/users



>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>Version: 8.5.430 / Virus Database: 270.14.119/2586 - Release 
Date:
>>12/25/09 09:33:00

>_______________________________________________
>Users mailing list
>Users at zonebbs.com
>http://www.zonebbs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users at zonebbs.com
http://www.zonebbs.com/mailman/listinfo/users