[Users] A Serious Miscarriage of Justice...

[Rachel D Keyte]

OK that is fair enough.  I have to go back and reread the tOS, obviously, Lol!
At 11:20 AM 26/12/2009, you wrote:
>Hi.
>
>Discussion of illegal acts is against the TOS, as stated in section 6.
>
>And while fantom500 sent quite a few of the questionable messages, 
>Tyler did contribute.  I don't have the messages here now, but a 
>quick lookup in QN History from 22:00 (last night) onwards will 
>reveal all.  But i'm pretty sure I saw Tyler contributing to this as well.
>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: Rachel D Keyte <racheldk at tpg.com.au
>>To: users at zonebbs.com
>>Date sent: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 10:53:33 +1100
>>Subject: Re: [Users] A Serious Miscarriage of Justice...
>
>>OK, but that's the thing right there.  why would you write that
>on the
>>zone? obviously no-one would have a clue what you're doing and
>hence
>>may become suss.
>>Anyway agree with the others; i wasn't there, but if you were
>talking
>>about hacking other accounts, that may be considered against the
>TOS.
>>If you were innocent and were simply just talking to your friends
>>about how such a thing would be done, just for the extra
>knowlege,
>>you'd be best off doing it away from the zone in future.
>>In saying all that though, if there was no proof that you did
>hack
>>into someone's account, you shouldn't have been banned.  I would
>think
>>it would be up to the community leaders/admins to be smart enough
>to
>>distingwish between a physical hack and/or just talking about it;
>>afterall, heaps of the same nonsense goes on the boards.
>>Cheers!
>>At 10:42 AM 26/12/2009, you wrote:
>>>That was the point--it was just a little app I wrote, pretty much
>for no
>>>reason at all.
>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: users-bounces at zonebbs.com
>[mailto:users-bounces at zonebbs.com] On Behalf
>>>Of Rachel D Keyte
>>>Sent: Friday, 25 December 2009 17:39
>>>To: users at zonebbs.com
>>>Subject: Re: [Users] A Serious Miscarriage of Justice...
>
>>>But I'm not following this.  Why would you want to allocate more
>memory, and
>>>to what exactly?
>>>At 10:16 AM 26/12/2009, you wrote:
>>>>OK, so here goes.  Anything preceded by a double slash (//) is a
>comment.
>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Users mailing list
>>>Users at zonebbs.com
>>>http://www.zonebbs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Users mailing list
>>>Users at zonebbs.com
>>>http://www.zonebbs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>Version: 8.5.430 / Virus Database: 270.14.119/2586 - Release
>Date:
>>>12/25/09 09:33:00
>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Users mailing list
>>Users at zonebbs.com
>>http://www.zonebbs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>_______________________________________________
>Users mailing list
>Users at zonebbs.com
>http://www.zonebbs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>Version: 8.5.430 / Virus Database: 270.14.119/2586 - Release Date: 
>12/25/09 09:33:00