[Users] A Serious Miscarriage of Justice...

[Dominique]

Yes, please do that.
Also if you want you can um: send us what you have privetly: but 
not sending one to the list?


> ----- Original Message -----
>From: Rachel D Keyte <racheldk at tpg.com.au
>To: users at zonebbs.com
>Date sent: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 11:22:06 +1100
>Subject: Re: [Users] A Serious Miscarriage of Justice...

>OK that is fair enough.  I have to go back and reread the tOS, 
obviously, Lol!
>At 11:20 AM 26/12/2009, you wrote:
>>Hi.

>>Discussion of illegal acts is against the TOS, as stated in 
section 6.

>>And while fantom500 sent quite a few of the questionable 
messages,
>>Tyler did contribute.  I don't have the messages here now, but a
>>quick lookup in QN History from 22:00 (last night) onwards will
>>reveal all.  But i'm pretty sure I saw Tyler contributing to this 
as well.

>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: Rachel D Keyte <racheldk at tpg.com.au
>>>To: users at zonebbs.com
>>>Date sent: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 10:53:33 +1100
>>>Subject: Re: [Users] A Serious Miscarriage of Justice...

>>>OK, but that's the thing right there.  why would you write that
>>on the
>>>zone? obviously no-one would have a clue what you're doing and
>>hence
>>>may become suss.
>>>Anyway agree with the others; i wasn't there, but if you were
>>talking
>>>about hacking other accounts, that may be considered against the
>>TOS.
>>>If you were innocent and were simply just talking to your friends
>>>about how such a thing would be done, just for the extra
>>knowlege,
>>>you'd be best off doing it away from the zone in future.
>>>In saying all that though, if there was no proof that you did
>>hack
>>>into someone's account, you shouldn't have been banned.  I would
>>think
>>>it would be up to the community leaders/admins to be smart enough
>>to
>>>distingwish between a physical hack and/or just talking about it;
>>>afterall, heaps of the same nonsense goes on the boards.
>>>Cheers!
>>>At 10:42 AM 26/12/2009, you wrote:
>>>>That was the point--it was just a little app I wrote, pretty much
>>for no
>>>>reason at all.

>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: users-bounces at zonebbs.com
>>[mailto:users-bounces at zonebbs.com] On Behalf
>>>>Of Rachel D Keyte
>>>>Sent: Friday, 25 December 2009 17:39
>>>>To: users at zonebbs.com
>>>>Subject: Re: [Users] A Serious Miscarriage of Justice...

>>>>But I'm not following this.  Why would you want to allocate more
>>memory, and
>>>>to what exactly?
>>>>At 10:16 AM 26/12/2009, you wrote:
>>>>>OK, so here goes.  Anything preceded by a double slash (//) is a
>>comment.

>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Users mailing list
>>>>Users at zonebbs.com
>>>>http://www.zonebbs.com/mailman/listinfo/users

>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Users mailing list
>>>>Users at zonebbs.com
>>>>http://www.zonebbs.com/mailman/listinfo/users



>>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>>Version: 8.5.430 / Virus Database: 270.14.119/2586 - Release
>>Date:
>>>>12/25/09 09:33:00

>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Users mailing list
>>>Users at zonebbs.com
>>>http://www.zonebbs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>>_______________________________________________
>>Users mailing list
>>Users at zonebbs.com
>>http://www.zonebbs.com/mailman/listinfo/users




>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>Version: 8.5.430 / Virus Database: 270.14.119/2586 - Release 
Date:
>>12/25/09 09:33:00

>_______________________________________________
>Users mailing list
>Users at zonebbs.com
>http://www.zonebbs.com/mailman/listinfo/users